Service
Governance, risk and compliance
When legal and risk teams are not given what they need to approve an AI use case, the default answer becomes no.
Deployment stalls indefinitely while pressure to ship increases, and the underlying problem is rarely the use case itself. It is that nobody documented the data handling, the confidentiality controls, or the acceptable-use boundaries in a form a risk team can actually approve against.
Method
What we do
Classify each use case by regulatory exposure
EU AI Act, sector-specific rules, and internal policy.
Document data handling and confidentiality controls
In the form your risk team actually reviews.
Write acceptable-use policy legal can approve
Specific enough to be enforceable, not a generic template.
Build the guardrails those policies require
Policy without enforcement is not governance.
Create the audit trail
What regulators and internal risk teams will ask for later.
Deliverables
What you get
- A use case risk classification
- A written acceptable-use policy
- Implemented guardrails
- An audit trail template
Logistics
Typical engagement
| Duration | Participants | Format |
|---|---|---|
| 4 to 6 weeks | Legal or compliance, the CISO or security lead, the business owner | Policy review, guardrail design, and documentation |
Who this is for
- You have a deployment stalled on legal or risk sign-off
Who this isn't for
- You do not have a specific use case yet. Start with an opportunity assessment